Efficacy of salvage surgery versus re-irradiation for isolated regional lymph node recurrence in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with isolated regional lymph node recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (irrNPC) who underwent surgery or re-irradiation treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 124 irrNPC patients who underwent initial radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2020. The staging of regional lymph node recurrence was as follows: 75.8% for rN1, 14.5% for rN2, and 9.7% for rN3. Fifty-five patients underwent regional lymph node surgery (Surgery group), and sixty-nine patients received salvage radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (Re-irradiation group). The survival rate was compared using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and evaluated by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 70 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%, and the median survival time was 60.8 months. There were no significant differences in 5-year OS (75.6% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.973), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS, 62.7% vs. 71.1%, P = 0.330) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 4.2% vs.78.7%, P = 0.677) between the Surgery group and Re-irradiation group. Multivariate analysis revealed age at recurrence, radiologic extra-nodal extension (rENE) status, and recurrent lymph node (rN) classification as independent prognostic factors for OS. The rENE status was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS. Subgroup analysis of the Surgery group revealed that the rN3 classification was an adverse prognostic factor for OS. Age at recurrence ≥ 50 years, GTV-N dose, and induction chemotherapy were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS, RRFS, and DMFS, respectively, in the Re-irradiation group. CONCLUSIONS: For NPC patients with isolated regional lymph node recurrence after initial radiotherapy, those who underwent surgery had survival prognosis similar to those who underwent re-radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A prospective study is needed to validate these findings.

Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy: a phase II randomised trial of re-irradiation and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BRIOChe) - protocol for a multi-centre open-label randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary malignant brain tumour. The condition is incurable and, despite aggressive treatment at first presentation, almost all tumours recur after a median of 7 months. The aim of treatment at recurrence is to prolong survival and maintain health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chemotherapy is typically employed for recurrent GBM, often using nitrosourea-based regimens. However, efficacy is limited, with reported median survivals between 5 and 9 months from recurrence. Although less commonly used in the UK, there is growing evidence that re-irradiation may produce survival outcomes at least similar to nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. However, there remains uncertainty as to the optimum approach and there is a paucity of available data, especially with regards to HRQoL. Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy (BRIOChe) aims to assess re-irradiation, as an acceptable treatment option for recurrent IDH-wild-type GBM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: BRIOChe is a phase II, multi-centre, open-label, randomised trial in patients with recurrent GBM. The trial uses Sargent's three-outcome design and will recruit approximately 55 participants from 10 to 15 UK radiotherapy sites, allocated (2:1) to receive re-irradiation (35 Gy in 10 daily fractions) or nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (up to six, 6-weekly cycles). The primary endpoint is overall survival rate for re-irradiation patients at 9 months. There will be no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms for the decision-making primary analysis. The chemotherapy arm will be used for calibration purposes, to collect concurrent data to aid interpretation of results. Secondary outcomes include HRQoL, dexamethasone requirement, anti-epileptic drug requirement, radiological response, treatment compliance, acute and late toxicities, progression-free survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: BRIOChe obtained ethical approval from Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (reference no. 20/NI/0070). Final trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and adhere to the ICMJE guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN60524.

Hypofractionated re-irradiation for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

BACKGROUND: Re-irradiation (reRT) increases survival in locally recurrent diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). There is no standard dose and fractionation for reRT, but conventional fractionation (CF) is typically used. We report our institutional experience of reRT for DIPG, which includes hypofractionation (HF). METHODS: We reviewed pediatric patients treated with brainstem reRT for DIPG at our institution from 2012 to 2022. Patients were grouped by HF or CF. Outcomes included steroid use, and overall survival (OS) was measured from both diagnosis and start of reRT. RESULTS: Of 22 patients who received reRT for DIPG, two did not complete their course due to clinical decline. Of the 20 who completed reRT, the dose was 20-30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions (n = 6) and 30-36 Gy in 3-Gy fractions (n = 14). Median age was 5 years (range: 3-14), median interval since initial RT was 8 months (range: 3-20), and 12 received concurrent bevacizumab. Median OS from diagnosis was 18 months [95% confidence interval: 17-24]. Median OS from start of reRT for HF versus CF was 8.2 and 7.5 months, respectively (p = .20). Thirteen (93%) in the HF group and three (75%) in the CF group tapered pre-treatment steroid dose down or off within 2 months after reRT due to clinical improvement. There was no significant difference in steroid taper between HF and CF (p = .4). No patients developed radionecrosis. CONCLUSION: reRT with HF achieved survival duration comparable to published outcomes and effectively palliated symptoms. Future investigation of this regimen in the context of new systemic therapies and upfront HF is warranted.

Multi-centre evaluation of variation in cumulative dose assessment in reirradiation scenarios.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Safe reirradiation relies on assessment of cumulative doses to organs at risk (OARs) across multiple treatments. Different clinical pathways can result in inconsistent estimates. Here, we quantified the consistency of cumulative dose to OARs across multi-centre clinical pathways. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We provided DICOM planning CT, structures and doses for two reirradiation cases: head & neck (HN) and lung. Participants followed their standard pathway to assess the cumulative physical and EQD2 doses (with provided α/ß values), and submitted DVH metrics and a description of their pathways. Participants could also submit physical dose distributions from Course 1 mapped onto the CT of Course 2 using their best available tools. To assess isolated impact of image registrations, a single observer accumulated each submitted spatially mapped physical dose for every participating centre. RESULTS: Cumulative dose assessment was performed by 24 participants. Pathways included rigid (n = 15), or deformable (n = 5) image registration-based 3D dose summation, visual inspection of isodose line contours (n = 1), or summation of dose metrics extracted from each course (n = 3). Largest variations were observed in near-maximum cumulative doses (25.4 - 41.8 Gy for HN, 2.4 - 33.8 Gy for lung OARs), with lower variations in volume/dose metrics to large organs. A standardised process involving spatial mapping of the first course dose to the second course CT followed by summation improved consistency for most near-maximum dose metrics in both cases. CONCLUSION: Large variations highlight the uncertainty in reporting cumulative doses in reirradiation scenarios, with implications for outcome analysis and understanding of published doses. Using a standardised workflow potentially including spatially mapped doses improves consistency in determination of accumulated dose in reirradiation scenarios.

Pattern of practice of re-irradiation for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in Italy: a survey by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

Purpose The Re-irradiation and the Breast Cancer Working Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) conducted a survey to provide an overview of the policies for breast cancer (BC) re-irradiation (re-RT) among the Italian radiotherapy (RT) centers. Methods In October 2021, 183 RT centers were invited to answer a survey: after an initial section about general aspects, the questionnaire focused on radiation oncologists’ (ROs) attitude toward re-RT in three different scenarios: ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) treated with second conservative surgery, IBTR treated with mastectomy and inoperable IBTR. Surveyed ROs were also asked to express their interest in being involved in a prospective trials. Results Seventy-seven/183 (42.0%) centers answered the Survey, only one RO per center was requested to answer. In particular, 86.5% ROs declared to have performed “curative” re-RT for IBTR during the previous two years (2019–2020): 76.7% respondents administered re-RT after second BCS, 50.9% after mastectomy, and 48.1% for inoperable IBTR. Re-RT practice varied widely among centers in terms of treatment volumes, dose and fractionation schedules, techniques and dose-volume constraints for organs at risks (OARs). Forty-six participants (59.7%) expressed their interest in participating in a prospective study investigating BC re-RT. Conclusions About one out of three RT centers in Italy delivered re-RT for IBTR. Nevertheless, practice of re-RT varied widely among centers highlighting the needs for prospective studies to improve knowledge in this field (AU)

Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma: twelve years' experience of a single center.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and the role of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as a re-irradiation technique in the management of progressive glioblastoma. METHODS: The records of 77 previously irradiated glioblastoma patients who progressed and received second course hypofractionated SRT (1-5 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 in our department were evaluated retrospectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: The median time to progression from the end of initial radiotherapy was 14 months (range, 6-68 months). The most common SRT schedule was 30 Gy (range, 18-50 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up after SRT was 9 months (range, 3-80 months). One-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after SRT were 46% and 35%, respectively. Re-irradiation dose and the presence of pseudoprogression were both significant independent positive prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). For PFS, progression-free interval > 14 months was also a prognostic factor (p = 0.04). The treatment was well tolerated without significant acute toxicity. During follow-up, radiation necrosis was observed in 17 patients (22%), and 14 (82%) of them were asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated SRT is an effective treatment approach for patients with progressive glioblastoma. Younger patients who progressed later than 14 months, received higher SRT doses, and experienced pseudoprogression following SRT had improved survival rates.

Re-irradiation for isolated neck recurrence in head and neck tumor: impact of rN category.

Unresectable, isolated lymph node recurrence after radiotherapy is rare but a candidate for re-irradiation. However, severe toxicity is anticipated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation in isolated lymph node recurrence of head and neck lesions. We analyzed 46 patients who received re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence without local progression. The primary tumor sites included the oral cavity in 17 patients, the hypopharynx in 12, the oropharynx in seven, the larynx in three, the nasopharynx in two, and other sites. During a median follow-up time of 10 months, the median survival time was 10.6 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 45.5%. The 1-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 49.8% and 39.3%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, age (≥ 65 years), the interval between treatment (≥ 12 months), rN category (rN1), and gross tumor volume (GTV < 25 cm3) were predisposing factors for better survival. In the multivariate analysis, the rN category and interval were identified as statistically significant predictors. Late toxicity grade ≥ 3 occurred in four patients (8.6%). These were all Grade 5 carotid blowout syndrome, which associated with tumor invasion of the carotid artery and/ or high doses administration for the carotid artery. Small-volume rN1 tumor that recur after a longer interval is a feasible candidate for re-irradiation. However, strict patient selection and meticulous care for the carotid are required.

Post-mastectomy reirradiation for ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor relapse: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Post-mastectomy radiotherapy is commonly recommended for T3N0M0 breast cancer, particularly in the presence of adverse prognostic factors. However, for T3N0M0 ipsilateral recurrences following breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, the situation is distinct. Recurrence alone signifies a negative prognostic factor. Moreover, tumor relapses within previously irradiated areas exhibit enhanced radioresistance, and reirradiation of the chest wall carries an escalated risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aimed to assess the impact of post-mastectomy reirradiation (PM-reRT) on patient outcomes in cases of ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence, using data from the SEER database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent treatment for primary non-metastatic breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in the SEER database; among them, those who later experienced a localized T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence and underwent total mastectomy were included. The study's goal was to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients who underwent only mastectomy versus those who had mastectomy followed by adjuvant PM-reRT for their ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor relapse. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, the SEER database recorded 44 patients with an ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence after initial conservative treatment, managed with total mastectomy. No statistically significant differences in OS or CSS were observed between patients undergoing mastectomy (MT) alone versus those receiving MT combined with PM-reRT (p = 0.68 and p = 0.86, respectively). Five-year OS rates for the MT and MT + PM-reRT cohorts were 49.5% [95% CI: 29.9-81.8] and 41.7% [10.0-100.0], respectively, while 5­year CSS rates were 51.6% [12.0-99.5] and 58.3% [15.2-100.0], respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing total mastectomy after an ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence, subsequent to initial breast cancer treatment involving breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, chest wall reirradiation does not enhance survival outcomes. As such, it should not be routinely performed.

Brachytherapy is an effective and safe salvage option for re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM): A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries from its inception to June 2023, for eligible studies in which patients underwent brachytherapy for rGBM. Outcomes of interest were mOS, mPFS, OS, PFS, and adverse events (AEs). For individual clinical survival outcomes and common AEs, weighted-mean descriptive statistics were calculated as a summary measure using study sample size as the weight. The calculation formula is as follows: weighted-mean = Σwx/Σw (w is the sample size and x is the outcome). RESULTS: This review included 29 studies with a total of 1202 rGBM patients, including 22 retrospective and 7 prospective studies. The results showed that from the time of brachytherapy, the mOS and mPFS were 6.8 to 24.4 months and 3.7 to 11.7 months. The OS of 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years, and 3 years after brachytherapy were 58.3 % to 85.2 % (weighted-mean 76.2 %), 26 % to 66 % (weighted-mean 41.9 %), 20 % to 37 % (weighted-mean 27.6 %), 11 % to 23 % (weighted-mean 14.8 %), and 8 % to 15 % (weighted-mean 12.1 %), respectively. The PFS of 6 months and 1 year after brachytherapy were 26.7 % to 86 % (weighted-mean 53.4 %) and 14 % to 81 % (weighted-mean 24.1 %). Most patients with rGBM will experience treatment failure again during the follow-up period, mainly local (10.7 % to 79.4 %) or marginal(3.6 % to 22.2 %) recurrence, followed by distant failure (6.7 % to 57.7 %). Although therapeutic AEs had not been uniformly reported, the overall toxicity rate was considered to be low. The common AEs reported included progressive neurologic deterioration, seizures, CSF leak, brain necrosis, hemorrhage, and infection/meningitis, with a weighted-mean incidence of 1.9 %, 2.4 %, 4.1 %, 5.4 %, 2.1 %, and 3.8 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarized above, albeit mostly level III, suggests that brachytherapy has acceptable safety and good post-treatment clinical efficacy for selected patients with rGBM. Well-designed, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled and prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Radiation-induced nasopharyngeal ulcers after re-irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a dose-volume-outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the interrelation between radiation dose and radiation-induced nasopharyngeal ulcer (RINU) in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 363 patients with locoregional recurrent NPC who received re-irradiated with definitive IMRT from 2009 to 2017. Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with RINU. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to re-evaluate the first and second radiotherapy plans and to identify predictive dosimetric factors. RESULTS: All dosimetric parameters were notably associated with the progression to RINU (p < 0.01) using paired samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Multivariate analysis showed that EQD2_ [Formula: see text]D80 (dose for 80 percent volume of the unilateral nasopharynx lesion) was an independent prognostic factor for RINU (p = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for EQD2_ [Formula: see text]D80 was 0.846 (p < 0.001), and the cutoff point of 137.035 Gy could potentially be the dose tolerance of the nasopharyngeal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: The sum of equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) in the overlapping volumes between initial and re-irradiated nasopharyngeal mucosal tissue can be effective in predicting the hazard of developing RINU in NPC patients undergoing radical re­irradiation with IMRT and we propose a EQD2_ [Formula: see text]D80 threshold of 137.035 Gy for the nasopharynx.

Stereotactic reirradiation in the treatment of head and neck cancers: A retrospective study on the long-term experience of the Oscar Lambret Center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy potentially treats unresectable recurrences of previously irradiated head and neck (H&N) cancer. This study aimed to assess its efficacy and safety and evaluate prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a large retrospective series that included 110 patients who had undergone 36-Gy, six-fraction stereotactic reirradiation (CyberKnife®) for recurrent/secondary H&N cancer between 2007 and 2020 at the Oscar Lambret Center. Patient characteristics and toxicities were assessed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 106.3 months. The 2-year OS rate was 43.8 % (95 % confidence interval, 95 % CI, 34.3-52.9) and the median survival was 20.8 months (95 % CI, 16.5-26.3). The cumulative 2-year local-recurrence, regional-recurrence, and distant-metastasis rates were 52.2 % (95 % CI, 42.4-61.1 %), 12.8 % (95 % CI, 7.4-19.8 %), and 11 % (95 % CI, 6.0-17.6 %), respectively. 73 patients received concomitant cetuximab, and it was not significantly beneficial (HR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 0.80-2.26; p = 0.26). The cumulative incidences of grade ≥ 2 late toxicity was 42 % (CI95%: 33-51) at 24 months. Two grade 4 bleedings and no treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: In a large retrospective series of SBRT reirradiation for recurrent or second primary H&N cancers, we observed a median OS of 20.8 months, with a cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late toxicity of 42 % at 24 months. Such a treatment is feasible. However, local recurrence rates remain non-negligible, warranting further research. Radiosensitizer use is currently under study. Therefore, establishing a balance between therapeutic modifications and toxicity is essential.

Technical note: Optimization functions for re-irradiation treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: Although re-irradiation is increasingly used in clinical practice, almost no dedicated planning software exists. PURPOSE: Standard dose-based optimization functions were adjusted for re-irradiation planning using accumulated equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with rigid or deformable dose mapping, tissue-specific α/ß, treatment-specific recovery coefficients, and voxelwise adjusted EQD2 penalization levels based on the estimated previously delivered EQD2 (EQD2deliv ). METHODS: To demonstrate proof-of-concept, 35 Gy in 5 fractions was planned to a fictitious spherical relapse planning target volume (PTV) in three separate locations following previous prostate treatment on a virtual human phantom. The PTV locations represented one repeated irradiation scenario and two re-irradiation scenarios. For each scenario, three re-planning strategies with identical PTV dose-functions but various organ at risk (OAR) EQD2-functions was used: 1) reRTregular : Regular functions with fixed EQD2 penalization levels larger than EQD2deliv for all OAR voxels. 2) reRTreduce : As reRTregular , but with lower fixed EQD2 penalization levels aiming to reduce OAR EQD2. 3) reRTvoxelwise : As reRTregular and reRTreduce , but with voxelwise adjusted EQD2 penalization levels based on EQD2deliv . PTV near-minimum and near-maximum dose (D98% /D2% ), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and accumulated OAR EQD2 (α/ß = 3 Gy) were evaluated. RESULTS: For the repeated irradiation scenario, all strategies resulted in similar dose distributions. For the re-irradiation scenarios, reRTreduce and reRTvoxelwise reduced accumulated average and near-maximum EQD2 by ˜1-10 Gy for all relevant OARs compared to reRTregular . The reduced OAR doses for reRTreduce came at the cost of distorted dose distributions with D98% = 92.3%, HI = 12.0%, CI = 73.7% and normal tissue hot spots ≥150% for the most complex scenario, while reRTregular (D98% = 98.1%, HI = 3.2%, CI = 94.2%) and reRTvoxelwise (D98%  = 96.9%, HI = 6.1%, CI = 93.7%) fulfilled PTV coverage without hot spots. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed re-irradiation-specific EQD2-based optimization functions introduce novel planning possibilities with flexible options to guide the trade-off between target coverage and OAR sparing with voxelwise adapted penalization levels based on EQD2deliv .

Curative high-dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas: outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent curative reirradiation (reRT), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PT) for unresectable recurrent or second primary head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). METHODS: Ten patients, mostly KPS 90%, were reirradiated (3/10 with IMRT and 7/10 with PT) at a median maximum dose to the CTV of 64.2 Gy from July 2011 to November 2021. Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the sinus (4/10) and the salivary glands (including the parotid and submandibular gland, 3/10). CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was the time between the end of reRT and the date of last news. RESULTS: The median time between the two irradiations was 53.5 months (IQR: 18-84). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12.5-51.8 months), six patients had developed a locoregional recurrence (LR), of which four occurred within the previously irradiated volume. Two and three-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55.6% [95%CI: 31-99.7%], and 41% [18.5-94%] and 66.7% [42-100%] and 44.4% [21.4-92.3%], respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly better in the subgroup of sinus tumors (p = .013) and the subgroup of patients re-irradiated more than two years after the first course of irradiation (p = .01). Seven patients had impairments before the start of reRT, including hearing impairment (3/10) and facial nerve impairment (3/10). The most severe late toxicities were brain necrosis (2/10), osteoradionecrosis (1/10) and vision decreased (1/10). CONCLUSION: Curative reRT for HNACC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of severe toxicity remain high. Improved selection criteria and more carefully defined target volumes may improve outcome in these patients. A further study including larger cohort of patients would be useful to confirm these results.

Pattern of practice of re-irradiation for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in Italy: a survey by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

PURPOSE: The Re-irradiation and the Breast Cancer Working Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) conducted a survey to provide an overview of the policies for breast cancer (BC) re-irradiation (re-RT) among the Italian radiotherapy (RT) centers. METHODS: In October 2021, 183 RT centers were invited to answer a survey: after an initial section about general aspects, the questionnaire focused on radiation oncologists' (ROs) attitude toward re-RT in three different scenarios: ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) treated with second conservative surgery, IBTR treated with mastectomy and inoperable IBTR. Surveyed ROs were also asked to express their interest in being involved in a prospective trials. RESULTS: Seventy-seven/183 (42.0%) centers answered the Survey, only one RO per center was requested to answer. In particular, 86.5% ROs declared to have performed "curative" re-RT for IBTR during the previous two years (2019-2020): 76.7% respondents administered re-RT after second BCS, 50.9% after mastectomy, and 48.1% for inoperable IBTR. Re-RT practice varied widely among centers in terms of treatment volumes, dose and fractionation schedules, techniques and dose-volume constraints for organs at risks (OARs). Forty-six participants (59.7%) expressed their interest in participating in a prospective study investigating BC re-RT. CONCLUSIONS: About one out of three RT centers in Italy delivered re-RT for IBTR. Nevertheless, practice of re-RT varied widely among centers highlighting the needs for prospective studies to improve knowledge in this field.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach-part I: prognostic factors and indications to treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Reirradiation (reRT) of locally recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck region is a potentially curative treatment for patients not candidate to salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize available literature on both prognostic factors and indications to curative reRT in this clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed on two topics: (1) patients' selection according to prognostic factors and (2) dosimetric feasibility of reRT. Postoperative reRT and palliative intent treatments were out of the scope of this work. RESULTS: Patient-tumor and treatment-related prognostic factors were analyzed, together with dosimetric parameters concerning target volume and organs at risk. Based on available evidence, a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to identify suitable candidates for curative reRT in clinical practice. This was then applied to two clinical cases, proposed at the end of this work. CONCLUSION: A second course of RT in head and neck recurrence/second primary tumors is a personalized approach that can be offered to selected patients only in centers with expertise and dedicated equipment following a multidisciplinary team discussion.

Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Locally Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Promising Curative Treatment for Both Radiation Therapy: Naïve Cases and Reirradiation Cases.

PURPOSE: It is difficult to effectively cure patients with unresectable locally recurrent colorectal cancers (LRCRCs) using conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy. Furthermore, treatment options vary depending on the patient's history of radiation therapy. Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a potentially curative treatment for these patients. Here, we compare the treatment outcomes of radiation therapy-naïve cases (nRT) and re-irradiation cases (reRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with LRCRC treated with CIRT at QST Hospital between 2003 and 2019 were eligible. CIRT was administered daily 4 d/wk for 16 fractions. The total irradiated dose was set at 73.6 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness-weighted dose [RBE]) for nRT and 70.4 Gy (RBE) for reRT patients. RESULTS: We included 390 nRT cases and 83 reRT cases. The median follow-up period from the initiation of CIRT was 48 (5-208) months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for nRT and reRT were 73% (95% CI, 68%-77%) and 76% (65%-84%), respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 50% (45%-55%) and 50% (38%-61%), respectively. These rates did not differ significantly (P = .55). The 3-year local control (LC) rates for nRT (73.6 Gy) and reRT (70.4 Gy) cases were 80% (75%-84%) and 80% (68%-88%), respectively. The 5-year LC rates were 72% (67%-78%) and 69% (55%-81%), respectively, without a significant difference (P = .56). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CIRT for LRCRC is a very effective and promising treatment for both nRT and reRT cases.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) re-irradiation for local failures following radical prostatectomy and post-operative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) are challenging for salvage treatment. Retrospective analysis of own experiences with salvage re-irradiation was performed. METHODS: The study included all consecutive patients treated with salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (sSBRT) for prostate bed recurrence following RP and postoperative RT at a single tertiary center between 2014 and 2021. Treatment toxicity defined as the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 genito-urinary (GU) or gastro-intestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) was assessed. A PSA response, biochemical control (BC) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The study group included 32 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median follow-up of 41 months, treated with CyberKnife (53%) or Linac (47%) sSBRT. Total dose of 33.75-36.25 Gy in five fractions (72%) was applied in the majority of them. Approximately 19% patients reported grade ≥ 2 GU AEs both at baseline and at three months, and grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity increased from 0% at baseline to 6% at three months after sSBRT. There was some clinically relevant increase in late toxicity with 31% patients reporting late ≥ 2 GU, and 12.5% late ≥ 2 GI AEs. Two grade 3 AEs were recorded: recto-urinary fistulas. The majority of patients showed a PSA response (91% at one year post-sSBRT). The 3­year BC was 40% and 3­year OS was 87%. CONCLUSIONS: Manageable toxicity profile and satisfactory biochemical response suggest that SBRT in patients with local recurrence following RP and postoperative RT might be a salvage option for selected patients.

Outcomes and toxicity in re-irradiation of gynecologic cancer: Systematic review of the Italian association of radiation and clinical oncology (AIRO).

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide a literature review on the efficacy and safety of reirradiation(re-I) of locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed in 4 electronic databases (1993-2020). Random-effects models and a tendency towards high heterogeneity (Cochran Q chi-square test and the I2 statistic) were used. A meta-analysis technique over single and multi-arm studies was performed to determine the pooled acute and late toxicity rate ≥ G3, locoregional control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Out of 178 articles, only 18 articles accounting for 820 patients (pts) met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were evaluable for 522 patients. Subgroup analyses highlighted moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. BT (Brachytherapy) showed a 2y OS of 63% (95% CI, 55 to 71 p = 0,36) and 5y OS of 42% (95% CI, 35 to 50, p = 0,43) with 1y-2y-3y LC of 74 (95% CI, 62 to 75, p = 0.04)49% (95% CI, 40 to 58, p = 0.38) and 48% (95% CI, 39 to 58, p = 0,45) respectively. Chemotherapy does not improve SBRT outcomes: BT showed a G3- G4 toxicities rate was of26% (95% CI: 8-49%); studies on SBRT re-I showed a G3-G4 toxicity around of 20% if combined with CHT, and <10 when alone. CONCLUSION: A large heterogeneity among studies was revealed, but showing promising results in terms of safety and feasibility. BT resulted the best kind of radiation therapy delivery in terms of clinical outcome and comparable to the SBRT technique in terms of toxicities.

Delivery of re-irradiation and complex palliative radiotherapy using proton therapy in pediatric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The intent of this study is to characterize indications for pediatric palliative-intent proton radiation therapy (PIPRT). PROCEDURE: We retrospectively reviewed patients 21 years and younger who received PIPRT. We defined PIPRT as radiotherapy (RT) aimed to improve cancer-related symptoms/provide durable local control in the non-curative setting. Mixed proton/photon plans were included. Adjacent re-irradiation (reRT) was defined as a reRT volume within the incidental dose cloud of a prior RT target, whereas direct reRT was defined as in-field overlap with prior RT target. Acute toxicity during RT until first inspection visit was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The Kaplan-Meier method, measured from last PIPRT fraction, was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent PIPRT between 2014 and 2020. Median age at treatment start was 10 years [2-21]. Median follow-up was 8.2 months [0-48]. Treatment sites included: brain/spine [10], abdomen/pelvis [3], thorax [3], and head/neck [2]. Indications for palliation included: durable tumor control [18], neurologic symptoms [4], pain [3], airway compromise [2], and great vessel compression [1]. Indications for protons included: reRT [15] (three adjacent, 12 direct), craniospinal irradiation [4], reduction of dose to normal tissues [3]. Sixteen experienced grade (G) 1-2 toxicity; two G3. There were no reports of radionecrosis. Median PFS was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-16.3]. Median OS was 8.3 months [95% CI: 5.5-26.3]. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indication for PIPRT was reRT to provide durable tumor control. PIPRT appears to be safe, with no cases of high-grade toxicity.